|
Begin with QueSPER's Toolkit: it is a way to help your organize your information project. Find out more by clicking on each part of the process.
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Evaluation Rubric for reliable sites and sources |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Credentials |
No credentials |
Credentials not related to the information |
Trustworthy because they their credentials were in field of study |
Facts |
No facts given; all opinion | Facts but no support for facts | Trustworthy because they were based upon research |
Research |
No research | Research methods were questioned | Trustworthy because methods were sound |
Conclusions |
Not based upon facts or research presented | Facts and research did not fit conclusions. | Trustworthy because logic and research made sense |
Connections to other reliable sources |
No other reliable sources given | Other sources were unrelated to the topic | Trustworthy because information was connected to other reliable sources. |
Evaluation Rubric |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Cited Sites |
Listed no sources but used them. |
Listed 2 sources |
Listed 4 sources |
Completed Notes |
No notes but evidence of reading articles |
Listed |
Notes listed & organized by cause |
Listed keywords used and ways to improve |
Blank but evidence of work. |
One keywordNo improvement stated |
2 or more keywords or 1 way to improve |
Drew Conclusions |
No conclusions or conclusions not supported by articles |
Conclusions supported by articles no personal statements |
Personal conclusion with reasons and supporting detail from articles |
Wrote paragraph |
No topic sentence or concluding sentence |
Topic sentence, or concluding sentence and some supporting detail |
Topic & concluding sentences strong supporting detail. |
© by Carol J. Fox, 2002
Updated
08/22/09 /
The QueSPER website is maintained by Carol J. Fox; Teacher-Librarian
/ Visitor Number |